This article discusses lessons learned as a research team conducted a large‐scale, multi‐site qualitative policy study. The lessons call for incorporating a variety of backgrounds and experience, for anticipating enormous complexities amid multiple stages of research and volumes of data, and for building firm commitments across team members as well as to the research itself. The authors contend that four different means of decision making are required when carrying out qualitative research using a research team approach. They counsel against symmetry of contribution by each member. They conclude that teaming as they practiced it was expensive in terms of time, money, and energy; yet if considered in light of effectiveness, teaming provides enormous gains in terms of professional reward and quality research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liggett et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: