Key result
Interactive two-way digital counselling did not show any effect on cardiovascular risk factors or lifestyle changes in patients with coronary artery disease compared with usual care.
Why the study?
Digital counselling has shown benefits in coronary artery disease, but no previous reviews have emphasized the interactiveness of digital counselling.
Does interactive two-way digital counselling improve cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle changes in patients with coronary artery disease compared to usual care?
Meta-Analysis
Does interactive two-way digital counselling improve cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle changes in patients with coronary artery disease compared to usual care?
Interactive two-way digital counselling did not demonstrate a significant effect on cardiovascular risk factors or lifestyle changes in patients with coronary artery disease.
Does not support routine adoption in CAD care; confirms neutral effects across trials.
AIMS: Digital counselling has gained paramount importance for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients' treatment in recent years. It has been shown to provide a multitude of benefits, including improved risk factors and enhanced lifestyles. No previous reviews have emphasized the interactiveness of digital counselling. Consequently, the aim of this review is to determine whether interactive two-way digital counselling can provide effective secondary prevention as alternative or adjunct care compared with usual care, where patients visit a cardiac clinic and obtain verbal information and written recommendations of the risk factors without a digital intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studies that implemented digital interventions in patient counselling among CAD patients were identified by searching 10 electronic databases at the end of August 2022 and updated on 15 December 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institution (JBI) protocol was used for screening, quality assessment, data extraction, and meta-analysis. In total, 15 papers were identified that reported the effect of interactive digital counselling on risk factors and lifestyle changes in CAD patients. The results of the meta-analyses had neutral pre-defined outcomes and did not show any effect on cardiovascular risk factors or lifestyle changes. CONCLUSION: There is a need for better descriptions of the content and delivery of interactive digital interventions in studies. In the future, digital interventions should be designed not only to focus on patient, but to incorporate social support, peer groups, and interactive tools on a digital platform. Social support has proved to be important in terms of adherence to treatment. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021247315.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lahtinen et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease (CAD). Interactive two-way digital counselling vs. Usual care was evaluated on Cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle changes. Interactive two-way digital counselling did not show any effect on cardiovascular risk factors or lifestyle changes in patients with coronary artery disease compared with usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: