Key result
Interactive digital counselling for secondary prevention in coronary artery disease showed neutral outcomes on key risk factors in a meta-analysis, largely due to sample heterogeneity.
Why the study?
Does two-way interactive digital counselling improve clinical indicators and patient-related outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does two-way interactive digital counselling improve clinical indicators and patient-related outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease?
Interactive digital counselling shows promise for secondary prevention in CAD, but current evidence reveals neutral outcomes due to heterogeneity, highlighting the need for more personalized, real-time interventions.
This invited commentary refers to ‘Effect of interactive digital counselling on risk factors and lifestyle in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, by M. Lahtinen et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae154. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a rapidly growing public health concern worldwide, and as more patients survive, the demand for tailored interventions and education increases.1,2 Modifiable lifestyle factors like reducing smoking, exercising, and improving diet are key areas where healthcare professionals, especially nurses, play a critical role in providing effective counselling.3,4 Advances in digital technology have made counselling more accessible, but many solutions lack true interactivity and a focus on prevention.5,6 Developing two-way, real-time tools that enhance or replicate the standard of care is essential. With limited evidence summarizing the current state of interactive digital counselling for patients with CAD, reviewing the available literature is both timely and meaningful. In the paper by Lahtinen et al.7, the authors evaluate the current literature on whether two-way interactive digital counselling can serve as an effective alternative or adjunct to usual care for secondary prevention. After synthesizing articles from 10 databases (IEEE, ACM, arXiv, Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, Scopus, JMIR Publications, Xplore Digital Library, and MedNar), the authors reviewed and summarized randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of interactive digital counselling on clinical indicators and patient-related outcomes in CAD. The data were pooled for statistical meta-analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conte et al. (2025) conducted an editorial in Coronary artery disease (CAD). Interactive digital counselling vs. Usual care was evaluated on Clinical indicators and patient-related outcomes (lipid profiles, blood pressure, physical activity, diet, BMI). Interactive digital counselling for secondary prevention in coronary artery disease showed neutral outcomes on key risk factors in a meta-analysis, largely due to sample heterogeneity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: