Key result
An enhanced mobile app-based walking intervention incorporating social-cognitive strategies significantly reduced the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (B -0.521, P < 0.001) at 12 weeks compared to standard treatment in female Korean-Chinese migrant workers.
Why the study?
Immigrant populations tend to be vulnerable to environmental factors influencing CVD risk, but the effectiveness of mobile app-based walking programs addressing social-cognitive determinants in this population was unknown.
Does a 24-week mobile app-based walking intervention enhanced with social-cognitive determinants reduce 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in female Korean-Chinese migrant workers?
Comparison
Enhanced treatment vs standard treatment
Design
Parallel randomized controlled trial
Follow-up
24 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Supports mobile app interventions with social-cognitive strategies for CVD risk reduction in migrant workers; extends prior walking trials to this population.
RCT (n=50)
Single-blind
Random Allocation Software
No
Does a 24-week mobile app-based walking intervention enhanced with social-cognitive determinants reduce 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in female Korean-Chinese migrant workers?
Effect estimate: B -0.521
p-value: p=<0.001
A 24-week mobile app-based walking intervention enhanced with social-cognitive strategies significantly reduced 10-year CVD risk and improved lipid profiles in female Korean-Chinese migrant workers compared to standard walking tracking.
Kim et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=50). Enhanced mobile app-based walking intervention vs. Standard mobile app-based walking intervention was evaluated on 10-year ASCVD risk score at 12 weeks (B -0.521, p=<0.001). An enhanced mobile app-based walking intervention incorporating social-cognitive strategies significantly reduced the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (B -0.521, P < 0.001) at 12 weeks compared to standard treatment in female Korean-Chinese migrant workers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: