Key result
A mobile phone-based lifestyle intervention significantly reduced 10-year cardiovascular disease risk compared to usual care (difference in change -2.83%; p=0.001) at 1-year follow-up.
Why the study?
Does a mobile phone-based lifestyle intervention reduce 10-year CVD risk in workers?
RCT (n=589)
Group-randomized
No
Does a mobile phone-based lifestyle intervention reduce 10-year CVD risk in workers?
Mean Difference: -2.83
Absolute Event Rate: -1.05% vs 1.77%
p-value: p=0.001
A mobile phone-based lifestyle intervention significantly improved 10-year CVD risk and metabolic parameters compared to usual care over 1 year.
Supports mobile phone-based interventions for workplace CVD prevention; extends RCT evidence for digital lifestyle tools in primary prevention.
With the rapid and widespread adoption of mobile devices, mobile phones offer an opportunity to deliver cardiovascular disease (CVD) interventions. This study evaluated the efficacy of a mobile phone-based lifestyle intervention aimed at reducing the overall CVD risk at a health management center in Guangzhou, China. We recruited 589 workers from eight work units. Based on a group-randomized design, work units were randomly assigned either to receive the mobile phone-based lifestyle interventions or usual care. The reduction in 10-year CVD risk at 1-year follow-up for the intervention group was not statistically significant (-1.05%, p = 0.096). However, the mean risk increased significantly by 1.77% (p = 0.047) for the control group. The difference of the changes between treatment arms in CVD risk was -2.83% (p = 0.001). In addition, there were statistically significant changes for the intervention group relative to the controls, from baseline to year 1, in systolic blood pressure (-5.55 vs. 6.89 mmHg; p < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (-6.61 vs. 5.62 mmHg; p < 0.001), total cholesterol (-0.36 vs. -0.10 mmol/L; p = 0.005), fasting plasma glucose (-0.31 vs. 0.02 mmol/L; p < 0.001), BMI (-0.57 vs. 0.29 kg/m²; p < 0.001), and waist hip ratio (-0.02 vs. 0.01; p < 0.001). Mobile phone-based intervention may therefore be a potential solution for reducing CVD risk in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=589). Mobile phone-based lifestyle intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Change in 10-year CVD risk (Difference -2.83%, p=0.001). A mobile phone-based lifestyle intervention significantly reduced 10-year cardiovascular disease risk compared to usual care (difference in change -2.83%; p=0.001) at 1-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: