PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology415 citations

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Prognosis in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

View Full Paper
DVDirk J. van VeldhuisenGLGerard C.M. LinssenTJTiny Jaarsma

Key Result

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) strongly predicted the composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (overall rate 42%), with similar prognostic value in both HFPEF and HFrEF patients.

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of B-type natriuretic peptide in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.
  • Evaluated heart failure patients with both preserved and reduced ejection fraction
  • Measured levels of B-type natriuretic peptide
  • Assessed prognosis outcomes based on BNP levels
  • Higher levels of B-type natriuretic peptide were associated with worse prognosis in both ejection fraction groups
  • Significant correlation between BNP levels and hospital readmission rates
  • BNP served as a reliable biomarker for evaluating risk in heart failure patients

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=615)

Structured PICO

Does baseline B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) predict prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction similarly to those with reduced ejection fraction?

P
Population
615 patients with mild to moderate heart failure (mean age 70 years, mean LVEF 33%), including both HFPEF and reduced LVEF (≤40%).
I
Intervention
Measurement of baseline B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations
C
Comparator
Comparison between patients with HFPEF and those with reduced LVEF (≤40%)
O
Outcome
Composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization at 18 monthscomposite

Baseline BNP is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in heart failure, with similar prognostic value for a given level in both preserved and reduced ejection fraction, despite lower absolute levels in HFPEF.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), in comparison to data in HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) EF (≤40%). BACKGROUND: Management of patients with HFPEF is difficult. BNP is a useful biomarker in patients with reduced LVEF, but data in HFPEF are scarce. METHODS: In this study, 615 patients with mild to moderate HF (mean age 70 years, LVEF 33%) were followed for 18 months. BNP concentrations were measured at baseline and were related to the primary outcome, that is, a composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, and to mortality alone. The population was divided in quintiles, according to LVEF, and patients with reduced LVEF were compared with those with HFPEF. RESULTS: There were 257 patients (42%) who had a primary endpoint and 171 (28%) who died. BNP levels were significantly higher in patients with reduced LVEF than in those with HFPEF (p < 0.001). BNP was a strong predictor of outcome, but LVEF was not. Importantly, if similar levels of BNP were compared across the whole spectrum of LVEF, and for different cutoff levels of LVEF, the associated risk of adverse outcome was similar in HFPEF patients as in those with reduced LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: BNP levels are lower in patients with HFPEF than in patients with HF with reduced LVEF, but for a given BNP level, the prognosis in patients with HFPEF is as poor as in those with reduced LVEF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Veldhuisen et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Mild to moderate heart failure (n=615). B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels vs. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) strongly predicted the composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (overall rate 42%), with similar prognostic value in both HFPEF and HFrEF patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a02c69dc5faccca0f49fehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.044
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper