Key result
Quadripolar left ventricular leads demonstrated a high implant success rate comparable to bipolar leads (98.4% vs 96.8%, P=0.49) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Why the study?
Do quadripolar left ventricular leads improve implant success rates and reduce complications compared to bipolar leads in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Observational (n=346)
Yes
Do quadripolar left ventricular leads improve implant success rates and reduce complications compared to bipolar leads in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both bipolar and quadripolar LV leads demonstrate high implant success rates and low complication rates in Japanese patients undergoing CRT.
Several studies have reported that the left ventricular (LV) lead implant success rate ranges between 88.0% and 92.4%. Coronary venous anatomy differs among patients thus, necessitating multiple types of leads. To date, the implant success rate among Japanese patients utilizing a pre-specified family LV leads (including bipolar and quadripolar) is not well known. The Attain Success Japan Study enrolled patients indicated for a de novo or an upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy implant. Patients were followed for 3 months, and the implant success rates with Medtronic Attain family LV leads as well as the incidence of complications related to the LV lead were evaluated.Three hundred 53 patients were enrolled from 29 sites in Japan; 346 patients had LV lead implant attempts. The LV lead was successfully implanted in 336 patients (97.1%). Bipolar and quadripolar LV lead implants were successful in 97.2% and 99.2% of patients, respectively (P = 0.43). Four complications (1.2%) related to the LV leads were reported; all of which occurred in patients receiving bipolar LV leads. The quadripolar LV leads were more frequently implanted in the apical segment compared with bipolar leads (21.6% versus 3.8%, P < 0.01). This study demonstrated a high implant success rate and a low LV lead-related complication rate, regardless of bipolar, or quadripolar in a Japanese cohort of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andò et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=346). Quadripolar left ventricular lead vs. Bipolar left ventricular lead was evaluated on Left ventricular lead implant success rate (p=0.49). Quadripolar left ventricular leads demonstrated a high implant success rate comparable to bipolar leads (98.4% vs 96.8%, P=0.49) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: