Key result
Transthoracic echocardiography underestimated aortic stenosis severity by ≥1 grade in 25.0% of patients compared to simultaneous cardiac catheterization (MSEPG difference 8.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg; P<.001).
Why the study?
Suitability for TAVI is determined by TTE despite LCC providing direct pressure measurements, prompting evaluation of potential clinically important discrepancies between simultaneous TTE and LCC in awake patients under physiologically relevant loading conditions.
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately classify aortic stenosis severity compared to simultaneous left-sided cardiac catheterization in awake patients undergoing TAVI?
Observational (n=108)
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately classify aortic stenosis severity compared to simultaneous left-sided cardiac catheterization in awake patients undergoing TAVI?
TTE frequently underestimates aortic stenosis severity compared to direct invasive measurement, suggesting a potential role for LCC in patients not meeting standard TTE criteria for TAVI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TTE underestimation of AS severity advises caution in TTE-only grading; leaves open whether catheterization refines TAVI selection.
BACKGROUND: Suitability for transcatheter aortic valve (AV) implantation (TAVI) is determined by using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), although left-sided cardiac catheterization (LCC) provides directly measured pressure data. TAVI in awake patients permits simultaneous comparison of TTE and LCC under physiologically relevant left ventricular loading conditions. We hypothesized that clinically important discrepancies between TTE and LCC would be identified. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAVI was performed in 108 awake patients undergoing intra-procedural TTE and LCC between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016, based upon pre-procedure TTE data. Intra-procedural assessments simultaneously were performed before and after prosthesis implantation. Based upon mean trans-AV systolic ejection pressure gradient (MSEPG), AS was graded as: mild (<20 mm Hg; grade 1), moderate (20 - <40 mm Hg; grade 2), or severe (≥40 mm Hg; grade 3). In 79 of the 108 (73.1%) patients, intra-procedural TTE and LCC assessments were concordant. In 2 of the 108 (1.9%) patients, TTE overestimated AS severity by ≥1 grade. In 27 of the 108 (25.0%) patients, TTE underestimated AS severity by ≥1 grade. In total, AS severity reclassification occurred in 29 (26.9%) patients. Overall, TTE underestimated MSEPG by 8.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg (TTE MSEPG versus LCC MSEPG; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Current TTE criteria appear to frequently and importantly underestimate AS severity. Because decision-making regarding TAVI often exclusively is based upon TTE data, these findings suggest either a continued role for LCC in the diagnostic assessment of AS in patients who do not meet standard TTE criteria or lowering TTE cutoffs for TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loyalka et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Aortic Valve Stenosis (n=108). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vs. Left-sided cardiac catheterization (LCC) was evaluated on Mean trans-AV systolic ejection pressure gradient (MSEPG) (8.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg underestimation, p=<.001). Transthoracic echocardiography underestimated aortic stenosis severity by ≥1 grade in 25.0% of patients compared to simultaneous cardiac catheterization (MSEPG difference 8.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: