Key result
Late percutaneous coronary intervention after STEMI yielded significant improvement in left ventricular remodeling at 6 months in patients with >20% viable myocardium in the infarct-related territory.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve left ventricular remodeling in stable patients presenting >24 hours after STEMI, and does this correlate with baseline myocardial viability?
Observational (n=68)
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve left ventricular remodeling in stable patients presenting >24 hours after STEMI, and does this correlate with baseline myocardial viability?
Late percutaneous coronary intervention (>24 hours) after STEMI significantly improves left ventricular remodeling, but only in patients with >20% viable myocardium in the infarct-related artery territory.
May support viability-guided late PCI for remodeling; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The ideal management of stable patients who present late after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is still a matter of conjecture. We hypothesized that the extent of improvement in left ventricular function after successful revascularization in this subset was related to the magnitude of viability in the infarct-related artery territory. However, few studies correlate the improvement of left ventricular function with the magnitude of residual viability in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention in this setting. In 68 patients who presented later than 24 hours after a confirmed first STEMI, we performed resting, nitroglycerin-enhanced, technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) before percutaneous coronary intervention, and again 6 months afterwards. Patients whose baseline viable myocardium in the infarct-related artery territory was more than 50%, 20% to 50%, and less than 20% were divided into Groups 1, 2, and 3 (mildly, moderately, and severely reduced viability, respectively). At follow-up, there was significant improvement in end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction in Groups 1 and 2, but not in Group 3. We conclude that even late revascularization of the infarct-related artery yields significant improvement in left ventricular remodeling. In patients with more than 20% viable myocardium in the infarct-related artery territory, the extent of improvement in left ventricular function depends upon the amount of viable myocardium present. The SPECT-MPI can be used as a guide for choosing patients for revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goel et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Late presentation after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=68). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Comparison based on baseline viability (>50%, 20-50%, <20%) was evaluated on Improvement in end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Late percutaneous coronary intervention after STEMI yielded significant improvement in left ventricular remodeling at 6 months in patients with >20% viable myocardium in the infarct-related territory.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: