Why the study?
Does the COACH risk engine accurately predict survival and HF-related hospitalization in patients discharged after acute HF?
Does the COACH risk engine accurately predict survival and HF-related hospitalization in patients discharged after acute HF?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The COACH risk engine is a validated multistate model that accurately predicts 18-month survival and recurrent HF hospitalizations in patients recovering from acute heart failure.
AIMS: Several models for predicting the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients have been developed, but all of them focus on a single outcome variable, such as all-cause mortality. The purpose of this study was to develop a multistate model for simultaneously predicting survival and HF-related hospitalization in patients discharged alive from hospital after recovery from acute HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The model was derived in the COACH (Coordinating Study Evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counseling in Heart Failure) cohort, a multicentre, randomized controlled trial in which 1023 patients were enrolled after hospitalization because of HF. External validation was attained with the FINN-AKVA (Finish Acute Heart Failure Study) cohort, a prospective, multicentre study with 620 patients hospitalized due to acute HF. The observed vs. predicted 18-month survival was 72.1% vs. 72.3% in the derivation cohort and 71.4% vs. 71.2% in the validation cohort. The corresponding values of the c statistic were 0.733 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.705-0.761] and 0.702 (95% CI 0.663-0.744), respectively. The model's accuracy in predicting HF hospitalization was excellent, with predicted values that closely resembled the values observed in the derivation cohort. CONCLUSION: The COACH risk engine accurately predicted survival and various measures of recurrent hospitalization in (acute) HF patients. It may therefore become a valuable tool in improving and personalizing patient care and optimizing the use of scarce healthcare resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Postmus et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: