Why the study?
Does telemonitoring with videoconferencing improve hospital service use, self-care, and quality of life in older adults with heart failure?
Does telemonitoring with videoconferencing improve hospital service use, self-care, and quality of life in older adults with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Telemonitoring with videoconferencing shows promise for improving hospital service use and quality of life in heart failure patients, though it may not improve self-care skills.
Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease associated with poor prognosis, poor quality of life (QOL), and high medical costs among older adults. Monitoring symptoms, interpreting symptoms, and decision making are self-care skills required for effective HF management. Telemonitoring (TM) is increasingly used to reduce incidence of symptom exacerbation leading to rehospitalization. An integrative review was performed to describe the efficacy of TM interventions that include videoconferencing (VC) on the HF outcomes of hospital service s use, self-care, and QOL. A review of 11 studies using VC combined with remote physiological monitoring demonstrated promising results in all areas except self-care. Additional research is needed to better specify the goals of VC interventions, the mechanisms by which VC interventions improve health outcomes, and the effect of VC interventions with adults of diverse race and ethnicity. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 44(4), 45-52.].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bauce et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: