Why the study?
It was hypothesized that radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with a specific rehabilitation program is more effective than sham rESWT plus rehabilitation in athletes with acute hamstring muscle complex injury type 3b.
Does radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with a specific rehabilitation program reduce time to return to sport in athletes with acute hamstring muscle complex injury type 3b?
Does radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with a specific rehabilitation program reduce time to return to sport in athletes with acute hamstring muscle complex injury type 3b?
Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with a rehabilitation program significantly reduces the time to return to sport compared to sham therapy in athletes with acute hamstring muscle complex injury type 3b.
Supports adding rESWT to rehabilitation for athletes with type 3b hamstring injuries; extends RCT evidence for faster return to sport.
Objectives This study tested the hypothesis that radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with a specific rehabilitation program (rESWT + RP) is more effective than sham rESWT + RP in athletes with acute hamstring muscle complex (HMC) injury type 3b. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, single center trial with published protocol, concealed allocation, blinded patients and blinded assessors. A total of 36 semi-professional athletes (soccer, field hockey and rugby players) receiving fees or university scholarships with acute HMC injury type 3b were randomly allocated to rESWT + RP for up to 5 weeks (n=18) or sham rESWT + RP (n=18). The primary outcome was the individual time to return to sport. Secondary outcomes were the individual patient’s satisfaction and presence or absence of re-injury during 6 months post-inclusion into this trial. Results No serious adverse events occurred during the trial. The median / mean time to return to sport was 25.5 / 25.4 ± 3.5 (mean ± SD) days after rESWT + RP (n=18) and 27.5 / 28.3 ± 4.5 days after sham rESWT + RP (n=18) (p=0.037). The mean patient’s satisfaction was not significantly different between the groups. Only one patient in each group experienced a re-injury during 6 months post-inclusion into this trial. Conclusion In rehabilitation of athletes with acute HMC injury type 3b, rESWT + RP is more effective than sham rESWT + RP. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03473899 (registered on March 22, 2018).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crupnik et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: