Why the study?
Does a multiprogrammable, atrial synchronous, ventricular inhibited pacemaker facilitate non-invasive evaluation and correct interpretation of ECGs in patients?
Does a multiprogrammable, atrial synchronous, ventricular inhibited pacemaker facilitate non-invasive evaluation and correct interpretation of ECGs in patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of a multiprogrammable, atrial synchronous, ventricular inhibited pacemaker facilitates non-invasive performance evaluation and correct interpretation of complex ECGs.
In the present study a multiprogrammable, atrial synchronous, ventricular inhibited pacemaker (Enertrax) was used in six patients. This pacer makes it possible to evaluate pacemaker performance non-invasively and facilitates the correct interpretation of the difficult ECGs produced by these complex pacemakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kruse et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: