Why the study?
Does perioperative infusion of sodium bicarbonate reduce acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery?
Does perioperative infusion of sodium bicarbonate reduce acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery?
Perioperative infusion of sodium bicarbonate does not attenuate the risk of acute kidney injury following cardiothoracic surgery compared to normal saline.
Clinicians should not use perioperative bicarbonate to prevent AKI in cardiothoracic surgery; this RCT confirms no benefit over saline.
Cardiac surgery associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is associated with poor outcomes including increased mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS) and cost. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) is reported to be between 3 and 30% depending on the definition of AKI. We designed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to test our hypothesis that a perioperative infusion of sodium bicarbonate (SB) during cardiac surgery will attenuate the post-operative rise in creatinine indicating renal injury when compared to a perioperative infusion with normal saline. An interim analysis was performed after data was available on the first 120 participants. A similar number of patients in the two treatment groups developed AKI, defined as an increase in serum creatinine the first 48 h after surgery of 0.3 mg/dl or more. Specifically 14 patients (24%) who received sodium chloride (SC) and 17 patients (27%) who received SB were observed to develop AKI post-surgery, resulting in a relative risk of AKI of 1.1 (95% CI: 0.6-2.1, chi-square p-value = 0.68) for patients receiving SB compared to those who received SC. The data safety monitoring board for the trial recommended closing the study early as there was only a 12% probability that the null hypothesis would be rejected. We therefore concluded that a perioperative infusion of SB failed to attenuate the risk of CSA-AKI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turner et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: