Why the study?
Is blood pressure level alone adequate to identify, diagnose, and predict the future course of hypertensive patients?
Is blood pressure level alone adequate to identify, diagnose, and predict the future course of hypertensive patients?
The management of hypertensive patients should be individualized based on comprehensive clinical, biochemical, and behavioral data rather than blood pressure levels alone.
Challenges BP-threshold paradigms in hypertension; leaves open validation of individualized risk stratification in prospective studies.
The proper management of mild and moderate hypertension remains a matter of considerable professional disagreement. Major clinical and population research has largely been designed to define a level of blood pressure (BP) at which treatment should be initiated. This paper reviews studies of the natural history of hypertension and the findings of intervention trials to determine whether the BP level alone is adequate to identify, diagnose, and predict the future course of hypertensive patients. Observational data suggest that patients defined by mild elevation of BP are a heterogeneous group who do not share a common prognosis. Moreover, intervention trials reveal that not all those at risk of cardiovascular disease will benefit from hypotensive therapy. Thus, BP level alone defines neither the group at risk nor those likely to benefit from BP reduction. It is therefore concluded that the management of each patient with hypertension should be determined on the basis of available clinical, biochemical, and behavioral as well as epidemiological data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alderman et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: