Why the study?
Does C-reactive protein measurement at admission improve the prognostic value of the GRACE score for in-hospital cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Does C-reactive protein measurement at admission improve the prognostic value of the GRACE score for in-hospital cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Routine measurement of CRP at admission does not provide incremental prognostic value over the GRACE score for predicting in-hospital cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support adding CRP to GRACE for ACS in-hospital prognosis; leaves open utility in other settings or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The incremental prognostic value of plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in relation to GRACE score has not been established in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with non-ST segment elevation. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that CRP measurements at admission increases the prognostic value of GRACE score in patients with ACS. METHODS: A total of 290 subjects, consecutively admitted for ACS, with plasma material obtained upon admission CRP measurement using a high-sensitivity method (nephelometry) were studied. Cardiovascular outcomes during hospitalization were defined by the combination of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal refractory angina. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiovascular events during hospitalization was 15% (18 deaths, 11 myocardial infarctions, 13 angina episodes) with CRP showing C-statistics of 0.60 (95% CI = 0.51-0.70, p = 0.034) in predicting these outcomes. After adjustment for the GRACE score, elevated CRP (defined as the best cutoff point) tended to be associated with hospital events (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.92 to 3.88, p = 0.08). However, the addition of the variable elevated CRP in the GRACE model did not result in significant increase in C-statistics, which ranged from 0.705 to 0.718 (p = 0.46). Similarly, there was no significant reclassification of risk with the addition of CRP in the predictor model (net reclassification = 5.7 %, p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Although CRP is associated with hospital outcomes, this inflammatory marker does not increase the prognostic value of the GRACE score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Correia et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: