Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study explores the link between TTNT and rwPFS in advanced ovarian cancer patients, suggesting TTNT as an alternative measure.
e17578 Background: Advanced ovarian cancer (aOC) is typically treated with platinum-based first-line therapy, but in second or later lines (2L+) some patients receive non-platinum regimens due to platinum resistance, toxicity, comorbidities, or patient/clinician preference. Although progression-free survival (PFS) is a commonly used efficacy endpoint in clinical trials, its assessment in real-world data is often limited by incomplete or delayed documentation of progression, prompting use of time to next treatment or death (TTNTD) as a pragmatic alternative. Because treatment changes can be driven by factors beyond progression, it is important to evaluate the correlation between TTNTD and real-world PFS (rwPFS) among aOC patients receiving non-platinum therapies in 2L+. Methods: This retrospective observational study used the Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived, de-identified database. Adults aged ≥18 years with stage III–IV aOC diagnosed on or after May 1, 2020, who received platinum-based 1L therapy, initiated second-line (2L) treatment and received a non-platinum regimen in 2L+ were included, with follow-up until Feb 28, 2025. TTNTD and rwPFS were both measured from 2L initiation and estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Patient-level association between TTNTD and rwPFS was assessed using inverse-probability-of-censoring weighted Kendall tau and Spearman correlation coefficients. Results: Among 306 patients included in the analysis, mean age at diagnosis was 67.8 years; 50.7% had stage III and 48.4% stage IV disease; 39.9% were platinum sensitive (PSOC), 60.1% were platinum resistant (PROC). TTNTD events in 286 (94.7%) and rwPFS events occurred in 273 patients (90.4%). Median TTNTD was 5.9 months and median rwPFS was 6.0 months, with no significant difference (log-rank p>0.05). Kendall’s tau between TTNTD and rwPFS was 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.68) and Spearman correlation was 0.76 (95% CI 0.66–0.83), both were higher in PROC (0.65 and 0.83) than in PSOC (0.59 and 0.69). Among 270 patients with both events, TTNTD event occurred before rwPFS event in 42 (15.6%), on the same day in 30 (11.1%), and after rwPFS event in 198 (73.3%). The median difference between TTNTD event and rwPFS event was 14.5 days. Conclusions: TTNTD and rwPFS from 2L therapy initiation appeared as moderately correlated in the aOC patients receiving non-platinum regimens in 2L+ with relatively short timing offset, suggesting that TTNTD may serve as a practical alternative when progression dates are incomplete or absent in real-world data. Nonetheless, sensitivity analyses and context-specific interpretation are warranted when using TTNTD as a proxy for rwPFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: