Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surveys different approaches to illocutionary pluralism, demonstrating the complexity of utterances with multiple acts.
Summary By challenging the classical assumption of a one-to-one correspondence between an utterance and an illocutionary act, this paper surveys a variety of approaches to illocutionary pluralism, all converging on the idea that a single utterance may perform multiple illocutionary acts at once. These approaches, classified as either context-dependent or context-independent, offer distinct perspectives on how such plurality is structured, conceptualized, and categorized. It is shown that adopting a multi-act perspective yields a more nuanced and explanatory account of linguistic meaning and of the complexity of actual language use, especially in contexts where multiple illocutionary forces interact within a single, unified utterance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maria Paola Tenchini (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: