Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic evaluation reveals novel classifications and future opportunities for medical lasers in clinical practice.
Medical lasers are a heterogeneous class of interventional and therapeutic devices. They are differentiated based on their active gain medium, which includes solid-state, gaseous, dye, and semiconductor (diode) formulations. The present article undertakes a systematic evaluation and synthesis of the findings from a reproducible dataset. The present study yields novel scientific results, including a four-level classification of medical lasers that considers the chemical formula for each type of gain medium. In addition, a multisided systemic analysis of the engineering application of medical lasers in clinical practice is conducted, including an analysis of the main engineering challenges as a structured framework. Furthermore, a clustering of engineering applications for medical lasers in 2025 is performed, and a quantitative landscape of medical lasers by variables is presented. The following variables are analyzed: wavelength (nm), power (W)/irradiance (W/cm2), fluence (J/cm2), and exposure time/pulse duration. The objective is to create a year-by-year “trend analysis” for future engineering opportunities (2026–2030). The structure of the article is logical and roughly follows the IMRAD structure, and a thread of argumentation is demonstrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antipova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: