What does this research mean for the field?

In tangential turning, 42CrMo4 low-alloy steel exhibits higher cutting forces than X5CrNi18-10 stainless steel but allows for better simultaneous optimization of productivity and surface quality, leading to a significantly lower composite sustainability index under optimal conditions. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to compare the cutting forces and surface roughness of low-alloy and stainless steel during tangential turning to identify sustainable machining practices.

May 30, 2026MachinesOpen Access

Comparative Experimental Study of Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness in Tangential Turning of 42CrMo4 Low-Alloy Steel and X5CrNi18-10 Austenitic Stainless Steel from a Sustainability Perspective

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

ISIstván Sztankovics

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Comparative experimental study evaluates cutting forces and surface roughness in machining two steels, suggesting sustainable practices.

Key Points

This study aims to compare the cutting forces and surface roughness of low-alloy and stainless steel during tangential turning to identify sustainable machining practices.
Full factorial experimental design utilized to assess effects of cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut.
Regression models developed to predict machining responses, with high coefficients of determination for both materials.
Pareto front analysis used to evaluate productivity and surface quality relationships.
42CrMo4 displayed 10-30% higher cutting forces and roughness values compared to X5CrNi18-10.
Optimal conditions for 42CrMo4 reduced the sustainability index by up to 65%.
X5CrNi18-10 showed 20-40% higher sustainability index values under similar conditions.

Cite This Study

István Sztankovics (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a7fef0307b78509432107 https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14060601

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

May 30, 2026MachinesOpen Access

Comparative Experimental Study of Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness in Tangential Turning of 42CrMo4 Low-Alloy Steel and X5CrNi18-10 Austenitic Stainless Steel from a Sustainability Perspective

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

ISIstván Sztankovics

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Comparative experimental study evaluates cutting forces and surface roughness in machining two steels, suggesting sustainable practices.

Key Points

This study aims to compare the cutting forces and surface roughness of low-alloy and stainless steel during tangential turning to identify sustainable machining practices.
Full factorial experimental design utilized to assess effects of cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut.
Regression models developed to predict machining responses, with high coefficients of determination for both materials.
Pareto front analysis used to evaluate productivity and surface quality relationships.
42CrMo4 displayed 10-30% higher cutting forces and roughness values compared to X5CrNi18-10.
Optimal conditions for 42CrMo4 reduced the sustainability index by up to 65%.
X5CrNi18-10 showed 20-40% higher sustainability index values under similar conditions.

Cite This Study

István Sztankovics (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a7fef0307b78509432107 https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14060601

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark