Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates adalimumab’s impact on inflammation control in non-infectious uveitis, indicating possible individualized treatment benefits.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) in Japanese patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU), with particular attention to etiologic differences in methotrexate (MTX) requirements and the feasibility of ADA dose spacing. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with chronic NIU or sclerouveitis treated with ADA for more than 6 months. Data included ocular inflammation control, systemic corticosteroid dose, and MTX use. The prespecified primary time point was 12 months. The primary endpoints were patient-level inactive uveitis and change in oral corticosteroid dose. Eye-level outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects models and generalized estimating equations. Survival analysis compared MTX requirements among etiologies, and dose spacing outcomes and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: = 0.035 at 12 months) and inflammation markers. Inactive uveitis was observed in 61.5% (48/78) at 12 months. Patients with late- or chronic-stage Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease/sympathetic ophthalmia showed a trend toward a higher requirement for MTX concomitance than Behçet's disease patient. Over half of the 24 patients attempting dose spacing relapsed (14/24), but disease control was regained by shortening intervals. The median relapse-free survival was 20.8 months (95% CI 14.5-25.2). CONCLUSION: ADA effectively controlled NIU and provided significant steroid-sparing benefits. Possible etiology-dependent differences in MTX requirements and relapse risk during dose spacing, support the optimization of individualized, closely monitored treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakamoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: