Systematic review demonstrates treatment-free remission rates in chronic myeloid leukemia, suggesting careful patient selection is crucial.
e18601 Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), enabling many patients to achieve deep molecular responses. Discontinuation of TKIs with the goal of treatment-free remission (TFR) is now an important therapeutic consideration, but relapse rates remain variable across studies. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to August 31, 2025, for prospective and observational studies reporting TFR outcomes in adults with chronic-phase CML following TKI cessation. Proportions of patients in TFR at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), and certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE. Meta-regression was performed to examine the association between TKI duration and TFR outcomes. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251143733). Results: Sixteen studies comprising 2,156 patients were included. The pooled TFR rates were 60% (95% CI, 54–65%) at 6 months, 55% (95% CI, 49–60%) at 12 months, 54% (95% CI, 48–59%) at 24 months, and 52% (95% CI, 45–59%) at 36 months, with substantial heterogeneity (I² >80%). Most relapses occurred within the first 12 months. Meta-regression showed a positive association between longer TKI duration and higher 6-month TFR rates (TFR6mo = 0.0835 + 0.2744×log10[median TKI duration, months]). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was rated as moderate. Conclusions: Approximately half of patients with chronic-phase CML who discontinue TKI therapy sustain long-term TFR. Longer TKI exposure is associated with improved success, supporting guideline recommendations to ensure durable deep molecular remission before discontinuation. These findings reinforce the feasibility of TFR as a treatment goal while highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and close monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tungjitviboonkun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: