Why the study?
Among smokers at high risk for lung cancer, ASCVD poses significant morbidity and mortality, but clinically important differences exist in using CAC scores from lung cancer screening to guide primary prevention compared with the general population.
How should CAC scores from LDCT be used to guide statin therapy and prevent ASCVD events in smokers undergoing lung cancer screening?
How should CAC scores from LDCT be used to guide statin therapy and prevent ASCVD events in smokers undergoing lung cancer screening?
CAC scores obtained incidentally during lung cancer screening with LDCT can be leveraged to personalize ASCVD risk and guide statin therapy in high-risk smokers.
May inform statin decisions via incidental CAC on LDCT in LCS; leaves open prospective validation against general-population thresholds.
Background: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality, and cigarette smoking is the most significant risk factor. Among smokers at high risk for lung cancer, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) also poses a significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, there are opportunities of the prevention of ASCVD events during lung cancer screening (LCS). Observations: Chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans used for LCS provide information about the absence or severity of coronary artery calcification (CAC), another independent risk factor of ASCVD events. Of note, there are clinically important differences in using CAC scores to guide primary prevention and statin therapy in smokers eligible for LCS compared with those of the general population. This review article focuses on these differences. Conclusions: We provide recommendations on using CAC scores from LDCT to guide the prevention of ASCVD events in LCS in addition to using cardiac testing and when referral to a cardiovascular specialist should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joel M. Kupfer (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: