PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Impact of RNA sequencing on diagnosis and therapy: Early results from a tertiary cancer center in India.

View Full Paper
ASAnkita SinghPMP. MehtaMSMoushumi Suryavanshi

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the real-world clinical utility of RNA sequencing for diagnosing and treating cancer.
  • Reviewed consecutive patients undergoing RNA-seq at a tertiary cancer center.
  • Evaluated diagnosis and treatment changes attributable to RNA-seq.
  • Identified fusions and amplifications as primary outcome measures.
  • RNA-seq identified fusions and/or amplifications in 13 of 26 (50.0%) patients.
  • Diagnosis changed due to RNA-seq in 4 of 26 (15.4%) cases, all driven by identified fusions.
  • Treatment course change attributable to RNA-seq was noted in 6 of 25 (24.0%) evaluable patients.

Abstract

e23522 Background: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) can detect gene fusions and expression-linked copy-number events that may be missed or remain ambiguous on standard workup. We evaluated the real-world clinical utility of RNA-seq specifically through fusion and amplification detection, focusing on whether results changed diagnosis and/or altered treatment. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients undergoing RNA-seq at our center. Utility endpoints were captured prospectively/retrospectively in the dataset as (1) diagnosis change owing to RNA-seq and (2) treatment-course change owing to RNA-seq. For this analysis, RNA-seq “unique yield” was defined as fusion and/or amplification reported. Outcomes were summarized overall and by sarcoma/mesenchymal vs other cancers. Results: Among 26 evaluable patients, RNA-seq identified fusions and/or amplifications in 13/26 (50.0%) (fusions: 12/26 46.2%; amplifications: 3/26 11.5%). Diagnosis changed owing to RNA-seq in 4/26 (15.4%), and all diagnosis-changing cases were fusion-driven (4/4). Treatment-course change attributable to RNA-seq was documented in 6/25 (24.0%) patients with evaluable treatment-impact data. Fusion/amplification yield was higher in sarcoma/mesenchymal tumors (8/14 57.1%) than in other cancers (5/12 41.7%). Diagnosis change owing to RNA-seq occurred in 3/14 (21.4%) sarcoma/mesenchymal cases and 1/12 (8.3%) other cancers; treatment change owing to RNA-seq was observed in 3/13 (23.1%) vs 3/12 (25.0%), respectively. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, RNA-seq demonstrated meaningful clinical utility primarily through fusion/amplification detection, with 15.4% diagnosis changes and 24.0% treatment changes attributable to RNA-seq. Impact was enriched in fusion/amplification-positive cases, supporting RNA-seq as a high-value adjunct test—particularly in diagnostically challenging sarcoma/mesenchymal tumors and selected carcinomas. Diagnosis change owing to RNA-seq (fusion-driven). Case Pre-RNA working diagnosis Histopathology Key RNA-seq finding (fusion/amp) Post-RNA integrated diagnosis / implication (as recorded) 1 Metastatic adenocarcinoma, CUP Adenocarcinoma FGFR–FILIP1 fusion Likely cholangiocarcinoma (site-of-origin reclassification) 2 Atypical teratoid / rhabdoid tumor ATRT, metastatic SS18–SSX2 fusion (t(18;X)) Fusion-consistent synovial sarcoma biology → diagnostic reclassification 3 Spindle cell tumor (low malignant potential; SMC differentiation) Spindle cell tumor (low malignant potential; SMC differentiation) LRRFIP1–ALK fusion ALK-rearranged IMT biology confirmed → diagnostic refinement/reclassification 4 Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) Spindle cell tumor (intermediate malignant potential; myogenic differentiation) RRBP1–USP6 fusion Nodular fasciitis (benign) → diagnosis changed to benign entity

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a818e0307b78509433661https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e23522
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper