Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Real-world comparative study shows anthracycline-free neoadjuvant therapy achieves similar pCR rates in HER2-positive breast cancer, indicating potential treatment options.
Anthracycline-free neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with dual HER2 blockade represents an alternative to anthracycline-containing regimens in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer; however, real-world evidence remains limited. We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients with stage I–III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab between 2022 and 2025. Patients received anthracycline-free (TCHP/TCH; n = 51) or anthracycline-containing (AC-THP/AC-TH; n = 111) chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary endpoints included treatment-related toxicity and cardiac safety. The overall pCR rate was 56.8%. pCR was achieved in 64.7% of patients in the TCHP/TCH group and 53.2% in the AC-THP/AC-TH group (p = 0.168). In multivariable analysis, age > 65 years was associated with a lower probability of pCR (OR 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01–0.57), while hormone receptor–negative status was associated with higher pCR rates (OR 2.21; 95% CI, 1.02–4.76). Grade 3–4 hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities differed between regimens. Cardiac toxicity was rare and similar between groups. In a real-world setting, anthracycline-free neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade achieved pCR rates comparable to anthracycline-containing regimens with acceptable toxicity and preserved cardiac safety, suggesting that it may be a reasonable treatment option for selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Büyükkuşcu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: