Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Updated systematic review reveals improved overall survival and progression-free survival in older adults treated with ICI–chemotherapy, suggesting implications for clinical practice.
e20152 Background: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for ~10–15% of lung cancers, and most patients present with extensive-stage disease (ES-SCLC) with poor survival. PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) added to first-line platinum-etoposide have changed standard care, but older adults (≥70 years) remain underrepresented despite forming a large real-world ES-SCLC population. With newer data and longer follow-up now available, we updated prior evidence to better define outcomes in older patients treated with ICI–chemotherapy. Methods: Following PRISMA principles, we searched multiple electronic databases from inception through January 5 for randomized trials of first-line platinum–etoposide with vs without PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. The most mature report per trial was used. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Random-effects meta-analysis pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with heterogeneity assessed by I²/τ²; funnel plots and leave-one-out analyses. Results: Ten studies contributed OS. ICI–chemotherapy significantly improved OS versus control (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71–0.89), with moderate heterogeneity (I² 31.8%, τ² 0.0096; p = 0.154) and a prediction interval of 0.61–1.02. Four studies contributed PFS, demonstrating improved PFS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60–0.74) with low heterogeneity (I² 10.4%, τ² 0.0013; p = 0.341) and a prediction interval of 0.54–0.82. Leave-one-out analyses showed stable effects, and funnel plots did not suggest major small-study effects. Conclusions: In updated randomized evidence, adding PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs to first-line platinum- etoposide provides clinically meaningful improvements in both OS and PFS, with low-to-moderate heterogeneity. These findings support continued use in older adults while emphasizing the need for better age-stratified reporting and dedicated studies to refine patient selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: