Multicenter retrospective study reveals diminished survival benefits of chemoimmunotherapy in patients older than 75 with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, suggesting age-dependent efficacy.
PurposeChemoimmunotherapy has improved outcomes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but its benefit in older adults remains uncertain because this population is underrepresented in clinical trials.We evaluated the real-world efficacy of first-line atezolizumab plus etoposide-carboplatin according to age in patients with ES-SCLC. Materials and MethodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective study across seven Korean institutions and identified patients with ES-SCLC treated between 2016 and 2022 with atezolizumab plus etoposidecarboplatin or etoposide-platinum chemotherapy alone.Patients with recurrence after prior limited-stage disease or incomplete records were excluded.End points were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models. ResultsAmong 550 identified patients, 538 were included: 247 received atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and 291 received chemotherapy alone.Overall, 111 patients (20.2%) were aged 75-80 and 57 (10.4%) were older than 80years.In the overall population, atezolizumab was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.93; p=0.006) and OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; p=0.006).Age-stratified analyses showed significant PFS benefit only in patients aged 70-75 (HR, 0.67; p=0.049) and significant OS benefit only in patients aged 65-70 (HR, 0.65; p=0.044).Beyond 75 years, neither PFS nor OS was significantly improved.Patients aged ≥75years also had lower ORR and more progressive or non-evaluable disease compared with <75years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: