Why the study?
Epicardial adipose tissue may link obesity and AF, but the pathophysiological connections and optimal treatment strategies remain uncertain.
Does bariatric and metabolic surgery affect epicardial adipose tissue and the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in obese patients?
Does bariatric and metabolic surgery affect epicardial adipose tissue and the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in obese patients?
This review highlights the pathophysiological role of epicardial adipose tissue linking obesity to atrial fibrillation, though the optimal treatment strategy remains uncertain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Treatment superiority remains unclear for epicardial adipose tissue and atrial fibrillation in obesity; leaves open randomized comparisons of bariatric surgery.
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a chronic disease, which has significant health consequences and is a staggering burden to health care systems. Obesity can have harmful effects on the cardiovascular system, including heart failure, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and atrial fibrillation (AF). One of the possible substrates might be epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), which can be the link between AF and obesity. EAT is a fat deposit located between the myocardium and the visceral pericardium. Numerous studies have demonstrated that EAT plays a pivotal role in this relationship regarding atrial fibrillation. AREAS COVERED: This review will focus on the role of obesity and the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and examine the connection between these and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT). The first part of this review will explain the pathophysiology of EAT and its association with the occurrence of AF. Secondly, we will review bariatric and metabolic surgery and its effects on EAT and AF. EXPERT COMMENTARY: In this review, the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment methods of AF are explained. Secondly, the effects on EAT were elucidated. Due to the complex pathophysiological link between EAT, AF, and obesity, it is still uncertain which treatment strategy is superior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: