Why the study?
Noncommunicable diseases cause skeletal muscle atrophy, dysfunction, and weakness that limit function and increase mortality, and home-based resistance training may promote skeletal muscle health.
Does home-based resistance training improve strength, functional ability, and quality of life in patients with noncommunicable chronic diseases compared to non-exercise or usual care?
Does home-based resistance training improve strength, functional ability, and quality of life in patients with noncommunicable chronic diseases compared to non-exercise or usual care?
Home-based resistance training may improve strength, functional ability, and quality of life in patients with chronic diseases, but better standardized reporting is needed to optimize interventions.
May support home-based programs in chronic disease management; extends evidence but leaves optimal protocols open due to heterogeneity.
Skeletal muscle atrophy, dysfunction, and weakness are consequences of noncommunicable diseases which result in exercise and functional limitations which contribute to poor quality of life and increased mortality. Home-based resistance training may promote skeletal muscle health. Electronic-based systematic searches were performed identifying randomised controlled trials utilising home-based resistance training in patients with noncommunicable diseases defined as cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus (type 1 and 2), chronic kidney disease (including dialysis), and chronic respiratory disease (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension). A comparator group was defined as one containing "non-exercise" or "usual care". Of the 239 studies identified (published between 1996 and 2020), 22 met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies contained an adjunct aerobic training component. Study designs and outcome measures showed large variation. Reporting of the principles of training applied within interventions was poor. Heterogeneity in study characteristics, and poor reporting of training characteristics, prevents formal recommendations for optimising home-based resistance training. However, home-based interventions are less resource-intensive than supervised programmes and appear to have the ability to improve or preserve pertinent outcomes such as strength, functional ability, and quality of life; potentially reducing the risk of mortality in patients with chronic disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Billany et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: