Why the study?
Does regional hypothermia initiated late during ischemia and maintained during reperfusion improve reflow and reduce infarct size in a rabbit model of acute myocardial infarction?
Does regional hypothermia initiated late during ischemia and maintained during reperfusion improve reflow and reduce infarct size in a rabbit model of acute myocardial infarction?
Regional hypothermia initiated late during ischemia and continued during reperfusion significantly improves reflow and reduces infarct size in a rabbit model of acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Encourages human trials of regional hypothermia in AMI; leaves open translation from this rabbit model.
OBJECTIVE: Reflow following coronary artery occlusion is an important predictor of clinical outcome. This study tests the effects of regional hypothermia, initiated late during ischemia and maintained for 2 h of reperfusion, on the no-reflow phenomenon. METHODS: Anesthetized, open-chest New Zealand White rabbits received 30 min of coronary artery occlusion and 3 h reperfusion. Regional myocardial hypothermia (H, n=14), starting 10 min before reperfusion and continuing for 2 h of reperfusion, was compared with normothermia (N, n=14). Regional myocardial blood flow (microspheres) was measured during occlusion and at the end of reperfusion. The anatomic zone of no-reflow (thioflavin S in vivo injection) and infarct size were measured in the ischemic risk region at the end of the study. RESULTS: Myocardial temperature in H rabbits was decreased by 5.0+/-0.4 degrees C from baseline (37.1+/-0.2 degrees C) and remained about 32 degrees C during the cooling phase, returning to 36.0+/-0.3 degrees C at 3 h. N hearts remained within 0.2 degrees C of baseline (37.3+/-0.1 degrees C) throughout. Both groups were equally ischemic during occlusion, but at the end of reperfusion reflow to the previously ischemic zone was significantly higher in H, 77+/-5% of normal blood flow versus 36+/-4% in N (P=0.0001). The zone of anatomic no-reflow was significantly smaller in H, 11+/-3% of the ischemic risk zone versus 37+/-3% in N (P=0.0001), and was proportionally smaller when represented as a percent of the necrotic zone 36+/-6% compared with 75+/-5% in N. Infarct size, expressed as a percent of the ischemic risk zone was significantly smaller in H vs. N hearts (27+/-4 and 51+/-5%, P=0.0000). CONCLUSION: This study shows that hypothermic therapy initiated late during ischemia and continuing for several hours of reperfusion significantly improves reflow and reduces macroscopic zones of no-reflow and necrosis in this model. The improvement in reflow was greater than would be expected in the H group compared with N, based on the extent of necrosis. As reflow is a predictor of outcome, this intervention may have clinical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S Hale (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: