Why the study?
Does fibrate treatment reduce the incidence of fatal and non-fatal MI in patients with established coronary disease and dyslipidaemia (hypertriglyceridaemia or low HDL)?
Does fibrate treatment reduce the incidence of fatal and non-fatal MI in patients with established coronary disease and dyslipidaemia (hypertriglyceridaemia or low HDL)?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fibrate therapy significantly reduces the risk of fatal and non-fatal MI in patients with established coronary disease who have hypertriglyceridaemia or low HDL cholesterol.
The statin trials in secondary and primary prevention have shown that lowering LDL cholesterol produces a reduction in coronary event rates of around 35%. The most common dyslipidaemia in MI survivors is mixed hyperlipidaemia rather than hypercholesterolaemia. New evidence from VA-HIT and BIPS suggests that relatively low levels of triglyceride may be associated with a significant increase in coronary risk. In patients with established coronary disease, treatment with a fibrate that lowers triglyceride and raises HDL cholesterol, but which has little effect on LDL cholesterol, slows the rate of progression of coronary lesions. In hypertriglyceridaemic patients who have survived an MI or who have angina pectoris, fibrate treatment reduced the incidence of fatal and non-fatal MI by 40% (p = 0.03) (BIPS). In patients with coronary artery disease, who have low levels of HDL, fibrate treatment reduced the incidence of fatal and non-fatal MI by 22% (p = 0.006) (VA-HIT). These patients represent around 25% of the post-MI population. Work in progress will shortly define the effect of fibrate treatment on coronary event rate in patients with peripheral vascular disease and Type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony Mooney (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: