Why the study?
To summarize the past year's clinical and basic science literature regarding potential adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors.
What is the quality of evidence regarding the potential adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors?
What is the quality of evidence regarding the potential adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors?
The review highlights that while observational studies suggest numerous adverse effects of PPIs, the evidence quality is very low and not confirmed by RCTs, emphasizing the need for appropriate prescribing without undue alarm.
Supports appropriate PPI prescribing without alarm from unconfirmed observational risks; leaves open definitive RCT confirmation of adverse effects.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the past year's literature, both clinical and basic science, regarding potential adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). RECENT FINDINGS: PPIs are amongst the most widely prescribed and over-prescribed medications worldwide. Although generally considered well tolerated, epidemiologic studies that mine large databases have reported a panoply of putative adverse effects associated with PPIs. It should be emphasized that the quality of the evidence underlying most of these associations is very low and the studies, by design, cannot ascribe cause and effect. These associations continue to be sensationalized in the media and misinterpreted by providers and patients. The unintended consequences are that patients who require PPIs, such as those taking dual antiplatelet agents, are not being prescribed or taking these necessary medications. In addition, physicians are spending an inordinate amount of additional time placing these findings into proper perspective for their patients and reassuring them upon initiating PPI treatment as well as at every follow-up visit. SUMMARY: Most of the recent publicized putative serious adverse effects attributed to PPIs rely on observational data and have not been confirmed in prospective randomized trials. Nevertheless, PPIs should be prescribed for valid indications and when prescribed long-term, they should be used at the lowest effective dose and the need for their use periodically reassessed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell L. Schubert (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: