Why the study?
Viral capsid proteins for subunit vaccines are often limited by production complexity and low immunogenicity.
Does engineering viral capsid proteins into membrane-bound forms enhance their immunogenicity compared to native intracellular forms in mice and pigs?
Does engineering viral capsid proteins into membrane-bound forms enhance their immunogenicity compared to native intracellular forms in mice and pigs?
Engineering viral capsid proteins into membrane-bound forms via mRNA vaccination enhances their folding, multimeric structure formation, and immunogenicity, offering a promising approach for subunit vaccine development.
Membrane-bound antigen formats may boost mRNA vaccine responses in large animals; leaves open translation to human subunit vaccines.
Viral capsid proteins are widely explored for subunit vaccine development but are often hampered by their complexity of production and low immunogenicity. Here, we report a simple approach to overcoming these challenges by combining mRNA vaccine technology with protein engineering. Using African swine fever virus (ASFV) capsid proteins P72 and penton as models, we engineered them into membrane-bound and secreted forms and compared their immunogenicity to that of the native intracellular form in mice and pigs through mRNA vaccination. The membrane-bound and secreted P72 and penton folded into their native multimeric structure independent of the viral chaperone, therefore preserving their conformational epitopes. The membrane-bound P72 and penton also elicited significantly stronger antibody and T cell responses than their secreted or intracellular counterparts. Our study provides a simple approach to enhancing folding, multimeric structure formation, and immunogenicity of viral capsid proteins for ASFV subunit vaccine development and immunogenicity of intracellular proteins in general.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: