Key result
Growth hormone supplementation in GH-normal rats produced significant treatment effects in cranial, midface, and limb lengths, which varied inversely with relative maturity during early treatment.
Why the study?
Does rhGH supplementation alter craniofacial and limb growth in GH-normal rats?
Does rhGH supplementation alter craniofacial and limb growth in GH-normal rats?
Growth hormone supplementation in GH-normal rats produces craniofacial and limb growth effects that depend on the timing of administration and differ from patterns seen in GH-deficient models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maturity-dependent rhGH effects in GH-normal rats extend deficient models; leaves open human craniofacial translation.
Growth hormone (GH) supplementation has become a popular treatment approach for GH normal children with short stature. To investigate how the timing of GH supplementation affects the growth of the craniofacial region, three groups of GH-normal, 28-day-old female Wistar rats were examined over 4 weeks: the early group (n = 10) received two daily injections of rhGH (2 mg/kg/day) from days 1 to 28, the late group (n = 10) received two daily saline injections from days 1 to 14 (Phase I) followed by two daily injections of rhGH from days 14 to 28 (Phase II), and the control group (n = 12) received two daily saline injections from days 1 to 28. Lateral cephalometric, forelimb and hindlimb radiographs obtained weekly were scanned, standardized points digitized, and distances were measured using the Viewbox software. Growth curves between groups were compared using multilevel iterative generalized least squares curve fitting procedures. Supplementation during Phase I in the early group produced significant treatment effects in cranial and cranial base, midface, posterior corpus, and limb lengths which varied inversely with relative maturity (percentage growth completed at the start of the study). During Phase II, GH supplementation in the early and late groups showed treatment effects as above and additional viscerocranial and mandibular measurements, but these effects were unrelated to the relative maturity of the variables. These latter results are at variance with earlier findings in GH-deficient rats, raising the possibility that that GH-normal rats may not respond to GH supplementation in a similar fashion to GH-deficient rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bills et al. (2008) studied GH-normal short stature model (n=32). rhGH vs. Saline was evaluated on Craniofacial and limb growth measured via lateral cephalometric, forelimb and hindlimb radiographs. Growth hormone supplementation in GH-normal rats produced significant treatment effects in cranial, midface, and limb lengths, which varied inversely with relative maturity during early treatment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: