Key result
Applying sophisticated EHR-based quality measures increased the measured rate of adequate hypertension care from 58.1% to 80.5% in nondiabetics, and from 29.9% to 73.6% in diabetics.
Why the study?
Does using sophisticated EHR-based measures improve the assessment of hypertension care quality compared to simple outcome measures in hypertensive adults?
Population
5905 hypertensive adults with 3 or more clinic visits between July 1, 2005 and December 31, 2006 at an…
Comparison
Sophisticated hypertension quality measures… vs Simple outcome measures
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support nuanced EHR hypertension metrics to avoid penalizing resistant cases; leaves open prospective outcome validation before changing assessments.
Cross-Sectional (n=5,905)
No
Does using sophisticated EHR-based measures improve the assessment of hypertension care quality compared to simple outcome measures in hypertensive adults?
Sophisticated EHR-based hypertension measures provide a more nuanced and potentially more accurate assessment of care quality than simple last-blood-pressure metrics, avoiding penalization for treating resistant hypertension.
Persell et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=5,905). Complex EHR-based hypertension quality measures vs. Simple outcome measures (last blood pressure below goal) was evaluated on Proportion of patients classified as having adequate hypertension care. Applying sophisticated EHR-based quality measures increased the measured rate of adequate hypertension care from 58.1% to 80.5% in nondiabetics, and from 29.9% to 73.6% in diabetics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: