Key result
Limited DSE ischemia indicates significant anatomical coronary stenosis in ~63% of patients with known CAD.
Why the study?
The diagnostic value of limited myocardial ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography was not well known.
Does limited myocardial ischemia on dobutamine stress echocardiography predict significant anatomical and functional coronary stenosis in patients with varying cardiovascular risk profiles?
Observational (n=212)
Does limited myocardial ischemia on dobutamine stress echocardiography predict significant anatomical and functional coronary stenosis in patients with varying cardiovascular risk profiles?
Limited myocardial ischemia (1 apical segment) on dobutamine stress echocardiography frequently indicates significant anatomical and functional coronary stenosis in patients with known CAD or a high-risk profile.
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of limited myocardial ischemia in DSE is not well known. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether myocardial ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in 1 apical segment of any of the ventricular walls of the left ventricle relates to the anatomical and functional stenosis of the suppling coronary artery. METHODS: Our observational, prospective study enrolled 212 patients, symptomatic or asymptomatic, with newly diagnosed limited myocardial ischemia on DSE. Almost 25% of them had already known CAD, while the rest were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups, integrating 1-2 and ≥3 classical cardiovascular risk factors, respectively. After DSE, all patients underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and were followed up for one year. In coronary arteries distributing ischemic area, the calculated stenosis ≥50% and FFR<0.8 were considered anatomically and functionally significant, respectively. In the latter cases, the patients underwent coronary revascularization. RESULTS: Significant anatomical and functional stenosis of the supplying coronary artery was common among patients with already known CAD (62.5% and 44.5%, respectively) or those without CAD but a high-risk profile (60.2% and 25.6%, respectively). In logistic regression analysis, CAD revascularization was independently determined by an already known CAD, diabetes mellitus, and high-risk profile. During follow-up, 24 patients experienced ACS or new angina episodes, which were associated with diabetes and smoking in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Limited myocardial ischemia may implicate significant anatomical and functional coronary stenosis among individuals with a history of CAD or those without known CAD but a high-risk profile. The prognostic value of our findings requires further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadoglou et al. (2024) conducted an observational in newly diagnosed limited myocardial ischemia on DSE (n=212). Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) was evaluated on Anatomical (stenosis ≥50%) and functional (FFR<0.8) significance of the supplying coronary artery. Limited myocardial ischemia on DSE indicated significant anatomical and functional coronary stenosis in patients with known CAD (62.5% and 44.5%) or a high-risk profile (60.2% and 25.6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: