PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1994Medical Care186 citations

The Costs of Interrupting Antihypertensive Drug Therapy in a Medicaid Population

View Full Paper
JMJeffrey S. McCombsMNMichael B. NicholCNCecelia M. Newman

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the financial impact of interrupting antihypertensive drug therapy on healthcare costs among Medicaid patients over 40 years old.
  • Used paid claims data from California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) program

Structured PICO

Does the interruption or termination of antihypertensive drug therapy increase total health care costs in non-institutionalized Medicaid patients older than age 40?

P
Population
Non-institutionalized California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) patients older than age 40 who survive the first year after initiating antihypertensive drug therapy.
I
Intervention
Interruption or termination of antihypertensive drug therapy during the first year
C
Comparator
Maintained continuous antihypertensive therapy
O
Outcome
Total cost of health care in the first year after the initiation of drug therapy

Interrupting antihypertensive therapy in the first year is associated with significantly higher overall healthcare costs, driven primarily by increased hospital expenditures.

Abstract

This research explores the association between the interruption or termination of antihypertensive drug therapy and total health care costs among non-institutionalized Medicaid patients older than age 40 who survive the first year after treatment. Multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate the statistical relationship between post-treatment costs and patient demographic characteristics, prior use of services, the type of medication used as initial therapy and whether the patient maintained continuous therapy. Paid claims data from the California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) program were used in the analysis. Total cost of health care in the first year after the initiation of drug therapy was the primary outcome variable. Components of total costs (e. g. , hospital, outpatient and physician services, prescription drugs) were also investigated. Nearly 86% of new antihypertensive drug therapy patients interrupted or discontinued purchasing any form of antihypertensive medication during the first year. Patients with interrupted antihypertensive drug therapy consumed an additional 873 per patient (P <. 0001) in health care during the first year, not counting a reduction in prescription drug cost of 281 (P <. 0001). Increased costs were primarily due to increased hospital expenditures of 637 (P <. 0002).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McCombs et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1acce849c3147e1045f5f4https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199403000-00003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Long-term Cost-effectiveness of Various Initial Monotherapies for Mild to Moderate Hypertension1990 · 274 citations
  2. 2Process versus outcome in hypertension: a positive result.1982 · 47 citations
  3. 3Antihypertensive Drug Treatment in Elderly Hypertensive Subjects1988 · 10 citations
  4. 4Non-Drug Treatment of Hypertension1985 · 114 citations
  5. 5Report of the joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure1977 · 406 citations