In this article, I critically reexamine what it means to be a qualitative leisure researcher. Specifically, I discuss three areas in which I believe the influence of positivism has distanced and detached us, thereby threatening the quality of our work. I address our failure to recognize and account for the role that our human ''selves'' play throughout the research process and how those selves subsequently shape our products; our failure to recognize and account for the role our emotions and personal experiences play in our research endeavors; and our specific data-collection and writing styles, which tend to adhere more to positivist ideals regarding how research should be conducted and reported. I argue that those things that are thought to be problematic in science need not be, and I propose that we adopt a reflexive methodology in leisure studies, a qualitative methodology more in keeping with the theoretical orientations with which we profess to be working.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherry L. Dupuis (1999) studied this question.