Why the study?
Does contrast ventriculography with isosorbide mononitrate compare to technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy for identifying myocardial ischemia in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Does contrast ventriculography with isosorbide mononitrate compare to technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy for identifying myocardial ischemia in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Contrast ventriculography with intravenous isosorbide mononitrate provides comparable diagnostic value to technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy for identifying myocardial ischemia.
Supports nitrate ventriculography as a potential alternative for ischemia detection; leaves open prospective validation against scintigraphy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the usefulness of cineventriculographies, before and after nitrate use, to technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy for the identification of myocardial ischemia. METHODS: Twenty-six patients were studied at basal conditions and 5 minutes after intravenous administration of isosorbide mononitrate (0.3 mg/kg), to evaluate the performance and regional wall motion of the left ventricle (LV). The results were compared too those obtained with technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy. RESULTS: Before nitrate, contrast ventriculography identified 30 normal segments, 62 hypokinetic segments, 28 dyskinetic segments, and 14 akinetic segments. After drug administration, 99 segments were normal, 11 hypokinetic, 11 dyskinetic, and 13 akinetic. Myocardial scintigraphy revealed 110 ischemic segments and 18 fibrotic segments (p < 0.005). After drug administration, the ventriculography showed increase in the velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (p = 0.0142), the ejection fraction (p = 0.0462), decrease in the end-systolic volume (p = 0.0031) and no change in end-diastolic volume. CONCLUSION: Contrast ventriculography using nitrate proved to be similar to perfusional myocardial scintigraphy in the identification of myocardial ischemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manfrói et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: