Why the study?
Does sublingual glyceryl trinitrate prior to resting 99Tcm-tetrofosmin imaging improve the detection of ischaemic myocardium in patients with severe coronary artery disease?
Does sublingual glyceryl trinitrate prior to resting 99Tcm-tetrofosmin imaging improve the detection of ischaemic myocardium in patients with severe coronary artery disease?
Administration of sublingual GTN prior to rest 99Tcm-tetrofosmin imaging improves the detection of viable, ischaemic myocardium in patients with severe coronary artery disease and fixed rest defects.
May enhance ischaemia detection with GTN-augmented rest imaging in severe CAD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Recent work has shown that rest 99Tcm-sestamibi uptake may underestimate the amount of perfused myocardium, suggesting infarct tissue in some instances when myocardium is hypoperfused but which will benefit from revascularization. Administration of nitrates before a resting 99Tcm-sestamibi injection has been shown to increase tracer uptake. We have used 99Tcm-tetrofosmin as a myocardial perfusion agent and imaged 30 patients at stress, rest and again at rest following administration of sublingual nitrates. All patients had angiographically demonstrated severe coronary artery disease and 27 patients had previous infarction. Twenty-one patients were stressed on a treadmill and nine using intravenous dobutamine. Images were analysed using both a visual and semi-quantitative analysis. Defects were observed in 39 coronary artery territories on stress 99Tcm-tetrofosmin imaging, 23 appearing fixed on standard rest imaging. Twelve (52%) of these defects showed reversibility on rest with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) imaging and increased reversibility was seen in 62% of defects reversible at rest. We conclude that, in patients with severe coronary artery disease and fixed rest defects, GTN given prior to the rest injection appears to improve the detection of ischaemic hypoperfused myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
THORLEY et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: