Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We analyzed the didanosine (ddI) arm of the randomized, placebo-controlled Jaguar trial in order to define a genotypic score for ddI associated with virologic response. In this arm, 111 patients experiencing virologic failure received ddI in addition to their current combination therapy for 4 weeks. The impact of mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene on the virologic response to ddI was studied in univariate analysis. Genotypic score was constructed using step-by-step analyses first including only mutations associated to poorer virologic response (scored as +1), while secondarily, mutations associated to a better response (scored as -1) were also eligible. Eight mutations were associated with a reduced response to ddI, M41L, D67N, T69D, L74V, V118I, L210W, T215Y/F, and K219Q/E, and two mutations were associated with a better response, K70R and M184V/I. The best prediction of the virologic response to ddI was obtained with a composite score comprising mutations added and subtracted (set II, M41L + T69D + L74V+ T215Y/F + K219Q/E - K70R - M184V/I; P = 4.5 x 10(-9)) and by comparing that to only mutations added (set I, M41L + T69D + L74V + L210W + T215Y/F + K219Q/E; P = 1.2 x 10(-7)). Patients had a human immunodeficiency virus RNA reduction of 1.24, 0.84, 0.61, 0.40, and 0.07 log(10) copies/ml when they were ranked as having a genotypic score II of -2, -1, or 0 or 1 and 2 mutations or more, respectively. In conclusion, we developed and validated a genotypic score, taking into account mutations negatively and positively impacting the virologic response to ddI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcelin et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: