Key result
Patient-specific 3D-printed dynamic mitral valve models accurately predicted individual mitral anatomy and allowed successful simulated mitral repair in all 10 models.
Why the study?
Does three-dimensional printed, patient-specific, dynamic mitral valve modeling accurately simulate mitral anatomy and repair outcomes compared to actual patient outcomes?
Does three-dimensional printed, patient-specific, dynamic mitral valve modeling accurately simulate mitral anatomy and repair outcomes compared to actual patient outcomes?
Patient-specific 3D-printed dynamic mitral valve models accurately replicate patient anatomy and can be used to successfully simulate and plan mitral valve repair preoperatively.
May support preoperative mitral repair simulation; leaves open clinical outcome benefits in patients.
OBJECTIVE: Planned mitral repair strategies are generally established from preoperative echocardiography; however, specific details of the repair are often determined intraoperatively. We propose that three-dimensional printed, patient-specific, dynamic mitral valve models may help surgeons plan and trial all the details of a specific patient's mitral repair preoperatively. METHODS: Using preoperative echocardiography, segmentation, modeling software, and three-dimensional printing, we created dynamic, high-fidelity, patient-specific mitral valve models including the subvalvular apparatus. We assessed the accuracy of 10 patient mitral valve models anatomically and functionally in a heart phantom simulator, both objectively by blinded echocardiographic assessment, and subjectively by two mitral repair experts. After this, we attempted model mitral repair and compared the outcomes with postoperative echocardiography. RESULTS: Model measurements were accurate when compared with patients on anterior-posterior diameter, circumference, and anterior leaflet length; however, less accurate on posterior leaflet length. On subjective assessment, Likert scores were high at 3.8 ± 0.4 and 3.4 ± 0.7, suggesting good fidelity of the dynamic model echocardiogram and functional model in the phantom to the preoperative three-dimensional echocardiogram, respectively. Mitral repair was successful in all 10 models with significant reduction in mitral insufficiency. In two models, mitral repair was performed twice, using two different surgical techniques to assess which provided a better outcome. When compared with the actual patient mitral repair outcome, the repaired models compared favorably. CONCLUSIONS: Complex mitral valve modeling seems to predict an individual patient's mitral anatomy well, before surgery. Further investigation is required to determine whether deliberate preoperative practice can improve mitral repair outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ginty et al. (2018) studied Mitral valve disease requiring repair (n=10). Three-dimensional printed, patient-specific, dynamic mitral valve models vs. Actual patient mitral repair outcome was evaluated on Anatomical and functional accuracy of mitral valve models and success of simulated repair. Patient-specific 3D-printed dynamic mitral valve models accurately predicted individual mitral anatomy and allowed successful simulated mitral repair in all 10 models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: