Key result
Three-dimensional printing and computational fluid dynamics-guided surgical simulation significantly reduced the rate of transformation to mitral replacement and surgery time compared to image guidance.
Why the study?
Mitral valve repair rates vary widely depending on medical centers and surgical experience, prompting evaluation of 3D printing and computational fluid dynamics surgical simulation for decision-making.
Does surgical simulation using 3DP and CFD improve surgical outcomes and reduce the rate of transformation to mitral replacement in patients undergoing mitral valve repair compared to traditional image guidance?
Cohort (n=55)
Does surgical simulation using 3DP and CFD improve surgical outcomes and reduce the rate of transformation to mitral replacement in patients undergoing mitral valve repair compared to traditional image guidance?
Preoperative surgical simulation using 3D printing and computational fluid dynamics may reduce surgery time and the need for mitral valve replacement compared to traditional imaging.
Preoperative 3DP-CFD simulation may inform mitral repair planning; leaves open whether it improves outcomes in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair (MVR) has been considered superior to mitral replacement for degenerative MV disease and even rheumatic diseases. However, the repair rate varies widely depending on the medical center and the surgeons' experience. The aim of our study was to apply three-dimensional printing (3DP) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in surgical simulation to provide reference for surgical decision-making, especially for inexperienced surgeons. METHODS: Our study included retrospective and prospective cohorts. We first enrolled the retrospective cohort of 35 patients who were prepared to have MVR, aiming at exploring the feasibility of surgical simulation using 3DP and CFD. Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were performed for all patients, and imaging data were fused to construct a 3D digital model. Next, the model was used to make the 3DP dynamic model and for CFD analysis. Mitral repair was simulated in both the 3DP dynamic model and CFD to predict surgical outcomes (grade of regurgitation and vena contracta width) and possible complications (systolic anterior motion, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction). Second, a prospective cohort of 20 patients was studied with 10 patients placed in a 3DP-guided group and 10 in an image-guided group. Rate of transformation to mitral replacement, surgery time, surgical outcomes, and surgical complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: results. The result of surgical simulation for the 21 patients transferred to mitral replacement showed that 7 might have benefited from MVR. In the prospective cohort, the rate of transformation to mitral replacement and surgery time in the 3DP-guided group were significantly lower than those in the image-guided group. CONCLUSIONS: surgical simulation. These emerging technologies are now changing traditional models of diagnosis and treatment, and the role of imaging data will no longer be limited to diagnosis but will contribute more to assisting surgeons in choosing treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve disease requiring mitral valve repair (n=55). Three-dimensional printing (3DP) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) guided surgical simulation vs. Traditional image-guided surgery was evaluated on Rate of transformation to mitral replacement and surgery time. Three-dimensional printing and computational fluid dynamics-guided surgical simulation significantly reduced the rate of transformation to mitral replacement and surgery time compared to image guidance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: