Key result
Brachial blood pressure overestimates carotid stiffness by ~27% compared to central pressure in older adults.
Why the study?
Using brachial blood pressure as a surrogate for central blood pressure when calculating carotid arterial stiffness had not been studied in older adults.
Does calculating carotid arterial stiffness using central blood pressure compared to brachial blood pressure yield significantly different stiffness measures in older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=180)
No
Does calculating carotid arterial stiffness using central blood pressure compared to brachial blood pressure yield significantly different stiffness measures in older adults?
Using brachial blood pressure overestimates carotid arterial stiffness compared to central blood pressure in older adults, particularly those with hypertension.
May warrant caution using brachial BP for carotid stiffness in older adults; leaves open effects on risk prediction.
Background Using brachial blood pressure (BP) as a surrogate for central BP when calculating carotid arterial stiffness (CAS) has not been studied in older adults. Methods Veterans (n=180) age 65+ were recruited from Madison VA Hospital. Resting supine brachial BP and central BP (estimated from radial artery waveforms, Atcor Medical) were obtained. CAS (Peterson’s elastic modulus [PEM], Young’s elastic modulus [YEM]) and distensibility coefficient (DC) were calculated using brachial and central BP. Differences in CAS were compared using paired Wilcoxon tests. Linear regression models evaluated associations with cardiovascular risk factors. Results Participants were 70.4 (7.7) years old and 27.8% were female. Average brachial systolic BP was significantly higher than central (132.3 [18.6] mmHg vs 123.8 [17.7] mmHg p<0.001). Compared to brachial BP, using central BP to calculate stiffness measures resulted in significantly lower YEM and PEM and significantly higher DC (PEM: 480.6 [209.5] mmHg vs 378.3 [178.4] mmHg; YEM: 2220.2 [926.6] mmHg vs 1746.9 [785.4] mmHg; DC: 2.4 [1.0] x10 −3 mmHg −1 vs 3.1 [1.1] x10 −3 mmHg −1 ; all p<0.001). Absence of hypertension was associated with smaller differences in PEM and DC (PEM: β =−29.1, SE=12.1, p=0.02; DC: β =−123.8, SE=55.3, p=0.027), while older age was associated with greater differences in YEM when calculated using brachial vs central BP ( β =1.9×10 −5 , SE=0.69×10 −5 , p=0.006). Conclusions Brachial and central BP differ in older adults and result in significant differences in calculated CAS and distensibility. Brachial BP overestimates CAS, especially in those with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Older adults (n=180). Brachial blood pressure measurement vs. Central blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Young's elastic modulus (YEM) (p=<0.001). Using brachial blood pressure rather than central blood pressure to calculate carotid arterial stiffness significantly overestimates Young's elastic modulus (2220.2 vs 1746.9 mmHg) in older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: