PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2000Circulation361 citations

Impairment of Ventilatory Efficiency in Heart Failure

View Full Paper
FKFranz X. KleberGVG. VietzkeKWK. D. Wernecke

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine how ventilatory efficiency impacts prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure.
  • 142 congestive heart failure patients were evaluated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

Structured PICO

Does the VE versus V(CO2) slope predict event-free survival in patients with congestive heart failure?

P
Population
142 patients with congestive heart failure (mean NYHA class 2.6, mean LVEF 27%) and 101 healthy control subjects.
I
Intervention
Measurement of ventilatory efficiency (VE versus V(CO2) slope) via cardiopulmonary exercise testing
C
Comparator
Healthy control subjects (for baseline comparison) and internal comparison based on VE/VCO2 slope (<=130% vs >130% of normal)
O
Outcome
1-year event-free survival (composite of death, heart transplantation, cardiomyoplasty, or left ventricular assist device implantation)composite

The VE versus V(CO2) slope obtained during cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a powerful prognostic marker for 1-year event-free survival in patients with heart failure, outperforming VO2max.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impairment of ventilatory efficiency in congestive heart failure (CHF) correlates well with symptomatology and contributes importantly to dyspnea. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated 142 CHF patients (mean NYHA class, 2.6; mean maximum oxygen consumption VO(2)max, 15.3 mL O(2) x kg(-1) x min(-1); mean left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF, 27%). Patients were compared with 101 healthy control subjects. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed, and ventilatory efficiency was defined as the slope of the linear relationship of V(CO(2)) and ventilation (VE). Results are presented in percent of age- and sex-adjusted mean values. Forty-four events (37 deaths and 7 instances of heart transplantation, cardiomyoplasty, or left ventricular assist device implantation) occurred. Among VO(2)max, NYHA class, LVEF, total lung capacity, and age, the most powerful predictor of event-free survival was the VE versus V(CO(2)) slope; patients with a slope 130% (54.7%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The VE versus V(CO(2)) slope is an excellent prognostic parameter. It is easier to obtain than parameters of maximal exercise capacity and is of higher prognostic importance than VO(2)max.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kleber et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1b158d5aeb978a24c211e2https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.24.2803
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper