This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Weighted logrank tests are a popular tool for analysing right-censored survival data from two independent samples. Each of these tests is optimal against a certain hazard alternative, for example, the classical logrank test for proportional hazards. But which weight function should be used in practical applications? We address this question by a flexible combination idea leading to a testing procedure with broader power. Besides the test's asymptotic exactness and consistency, its power behaviour under local alternatives is derived. All theoretical properties can be transferred to a permutation version of the test, which is even finitely exact under exchangeability and showed a better finite sample performance in our simulation study. The procedure is illustrated in a real data example.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ditzhaus et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: