Key result
Maternal serum Elabela measures ~43% lower in preeclamptic women with fetal growth restriction versus healthy controls.
Why the study?
Reliable screening methods for fetal growth restriction are crucial, and elabela has been correlated with preeclampsia, which contributes to fetal growth restriction.
Does maternal serum Elabela level correlate with fetal growth restriction in preeclamptic women at 34 weeks of gestation?
Case-Control (n=110)
Does maternal serum Elabela level correlate with fetal growth restriction in preeclamptic women at 34 weeks of gestation?
Maternal serum Elabela is significantly reduced in preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction and may serve as a reliable screening biomarker.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support Elabela as FGR biomarker in preeclampsia; leaves open prospective validation before screening use.
Background: Reliable screening methods for fetal growth restriction (FGR) are crucial to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Preeclampsia (PE) is a specific pregnancy ailment that contributes to FGR. Elabela (Ela), a newly discovered adipokine, was correlated with PE. Objective: As a marker of PE, we aimed to examine Ela’s role in PE women with and without FGR as a possible screening biomarker at 34 weeks of gestation. Materials and Methods: A case–control study started from March 2022 to December 2022 recruited gestational age and body-indexed matched pregnant at 34 weeks into two groups. Healthy controls (55/110) and PE cases (55/110), were further stratified into (15/55) FGR-PE and (40/55) PE-without FGR. Demographics (systolic and diastolic blood pressure and body mass index), biochemical (creatinine, urea, uric acid, urinalysis, alanine transaminase, and aspartate transaminase), hematological (hemoglobin and platelets), and ultrasonic parameters [gestational age, fetal weight, umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), and amniotic fluid index] were compared for both. Maternal serum Ela was checked by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Results: Serum Ela was significantly low in FGR-PE (10.02 ± 1.63) cases, followed by PE (11.77 ± 1.02) and healthy controls (17.58 ± 2.72), P < 0.001. Ela was significantly inversely correlated with systolic and diastolic blood pressures ( r = -0.41, -0.50), respectively; moreover, it was positively and significantly linked to fetal weight and umbilical artery PI ( r = 0.42, 0.35), respectively. Conclusion: Strong and significant correlations of serum Ela with FGR markers at high sensitivity 87% and specificity82%, P < 0.001 in PE moms make it a reliable screening for FGR in PE cases. Future studies are warranted for possible therapeutic and prognostic applications in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction (n=110). Serum Elabela measurement vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Maternal serum Elabela levels (p=<0.001). Maternal serum Elabela was lower in preeclamptic women with fetal growth restriction compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: