Key result
EuroSCORE II accurately predicted early mortality in CABG patients with a predicted rate of 1.3% versus an observed rate of 1.25% (p=0.860) and an AUC of 0.972.
Why the study?
Does the EuroSCORE II model better predict early mortality compared to additive and logistic EuroSCORE models in adult patients undergoing elective CABG?
Cohort (n=400)
No
Does the EuroSCORE II model better predict early mortality compared to additive and logistic EuroSCORE models in adult patients undergoing elective CABG?
EuroSCORE II is a valid and highly accurate risk stratification tool for predicting early mortality in Bangladeshi patients undergoing CABG, outperforming older EuroSCORE models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports EuroSCORE II for CABG mortality stratification; extends validation in observational data but leaves broader adoption open.
A prospective consecutive series of 400 adults who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery between January 2014 and December 2016 was studied in National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute. The newly developed EuroSCORE II was applied in this sample and compared to the additive and logistic version of the models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mauin et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=400). EuroSCORE II vs. Additive EuroSCORE and Logistic EuroSCORE was evaluated on Early mortality (AUC 0.972, 95% CI 0.49-3.10, p=0.860). EuroSCORE II accurately predicted early mortality in CABG patients with a predicted rate of 1.3% versus an observed rate of 1.25% (p=0.860) and an AUC of 0.972.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: