Key result
Surgical pulmonary embolectomy provides excellent results for massive acute pulmonary embolism and the highest freedom from chronic residua when applied within a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach.
Why the study?
Does surgical pulmonary embolectomy improve survival and reduce chronic residua in patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism?
Does surgical pulmonary embolectomy improve survival and reduce chronic residua in patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism?
Surgical pulmonary embolectomy is a safe and effective option for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism when managed through a coordinated multidisciplinary algorithm.
May support selective use in multidisciplinary PE programs; leaves open need for RCTs versus endovascular options.
Acute pulmonary embolism remains a common and undertreated cause of death. Treatment modalities for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism vary from an institution to institution. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy is nowadays a well-established, safe operation, with good short and long term results, when performed by an experienced surgeon. We review the most current medical, surgical and catheter treatment options and results, and discuss our most recently adopted algorithm. When applied within a rapidly executed, coordinated, well-defined approach, the surgical treatment provides excellent results for massive acute pulmonary embolism and the highest freedom from chronic residua. A multidisciplinary algorithm agreed upon our hospital stakeholders such as the emergency department, cardiology and cardiac surgery can streamline the approach, reduce error and hopefully improve survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mudy et al. (2018) conducted a review in Massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy was evaluated. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy provides excellent results for massive acute pulmonary embolism and the highest freedom from chronic residua when applied within a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: