Relationships Among Diabetes, Microalbuminuria, and ACE Inhibition

Increasing worldwide rates of diabetes mellitus, combined with the significant micro- and macrovascular complications that accompany the disease, point to a heightened need to develop simple, rational strategies to protect against end-organ damage, particularly diabetic nephropathy. Although simple strategies do exist, i.e., early diagnosis of microalbuminuria (MAU) followed by nephroprotective therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, the use of these techniques should be increased. This is especially true for primary care physicians, who will continue to handle the majority of diabetic patients. To combat the underuse of this dual approach, this article reviews a stepwise approach to identifying early MAU so that therapeutic measures can be undertaken before the disorder progresses to diabetic nephropathy and, consequently, to end-stage renal disease in the majority of patients. Once a diagnosis of MAU is made, a variety of trials have demonstrated that ACE inhibitor therapy should be considered the standard therapy to retard worsening albuminuria and subsequent renal disease. ACE inhibitors can retard the progression of microalbuminuria and can lower the percentage of patients who progress to end-stage renal disease and death. Significant data indicate that ACE inhibitors should be used in MAU diabetics regardless of the level of blood pressure. In particular, the ACE inhibitor fosinopril may offer advantages because of its dual route of elimination, thus simplifying dosing in renally impaired patients. The newly developed angiotensin II receptor antagonists should be considered in patients intolerant to ACE inhibitors because of the similar effect on the interruption of the renin-angiotensin system.